How Scientists Are Updating Alfred Russel Wallace's Vision of Earth's Zoogeographic Regions
Imagine attempting to categorize every corner of our planet not by its nations or climates, but by the very animals that call it home. This was the ambitious task undertaken in the 19th century by Alfred Russel Wallace, a visionary naturalist who independently derived the theory of evolution through natural selection around the same time as Charles Darwin 1 .
Wallace divided the world's landmasses into six distinct regions based on animal distributions.
While Darwin focused on the mechanism of evolution, Wallace dedicated himself to understanding the geography of life—the patterns governing where different creatures live and why. His magnum opus, the 1876 work The Geographical Distribution of Animals, established a framework for zoogeography that would stand virtually unchallenged for over a century 1 .
Wallace's most enduring contribution was dividing the world's landmasses into six zoogeographical regions: Palearctic, Ethiopian, Oriental, Australian, Neotropical, and Nearctic. These weren't simple continental divisions; they reflected deeper biological realities. For instance, Wallace's line famously separated the Asian-affiliated fauna of Western Indonesia from the Australian species of Eastern Indonesia, despite their proximity 1 6 . His Ethiopian region included southern Arabia but excluded Northern Africa, which he grouped with Eurasia's Palearctic realm based on faunal similarities. Similarly, he divided the Americas not at the Panama Isthmus but further north in Mexico, recognizing that climate and evolutionary history created more meaningful boundaries than mere land connections 1 .
For generations, Wallace's map hung in biology classrooms worldwide, forming the bedrock of our understanding of global biodiversity patterns. It guided scientific research, conservation priorities, and fundamental biology education. But as Wallace himself would have appreciated, scientific understanding evolves. By the 21st century, with revolutionary advances in molecular biology, computing, and data collection, a critical question emerged: How would Wallace's map look if he had today's tools at his disposal?
To appreciate the modern update, we must first understand the elegance and limitations of Wallace's original design. Working in an era before DNA sequencing or computational algorithms, Wallace relied on morphological observations and distribution records of primarily mammalian families to delineate his regions .
Relative distinctiveness of Wallace's original zoogeographic regions
"Geographic barriers—not just distance—create biological boundaries."
Oceans, mountain ranges, and deserts proved more effective at dividing faunal regions than continental outlines.
What made Wallace's system revolutionary was its recognition that geographic barriers—not just distance—create biological boundaries. Oceans, mountain ranges, and deserts proved more effective at dividing faunal regions than continental outlines. The Sahara Desert, for instance, served as a more significant barrier than the Mediterranean Sea, separating the Palearctic and Ethiopian regions 1 . Similarly, Wallace recognized that deep-water trenches between Indonesian islands created a more profound biological division than the narrow straits suggested on a simple map.
Yet Wallace's system had inherent constraints. The limited taxonomic scope—emphasizing mammals while giving less attention to birds, amphibians, and other groups—reflected the scientific knowledge of his era. Furthermore, his framework couldn't fully account for the evolutionary relationships between species in different regions—the revolutionary phylogenetic understanding that would emerge a century later. These limitations created opportunities for 21st-century scientists to build upon, rather than discard, his foundational work.
As one researcher noted, "Wallace's scheme accords reasonably well with the standard six-continent model – but with a few important off-sets and one significant addition" 1 . This nuanced approach—recognizing both the enduring value and necessary revisions to Wallace's system—set the stage for a monumental scientific updating.
In 2013, a multinational team of scientists embarked on an ambitious project: subjecting Wallace's regions to rigorous, quantitative testing using the power of modern data and computational methods. Led by researchers from the Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate at the University of Copenhagen, the team published a landmark study in Science titled "An Update of Wallace's Zoogeographic Regions of the World" 9 .
The team compiled global distribution maps for 6,110 amphibian, 10,074 bird, and 5,302 mammal species from sources including the Copenhagen global avian distributional database and the International Union for Conservation of Nature 9 .
Researchers incorporated evolutionary relationships using phylogenetic trees for all groups, allowing them to measure not just species similarity but evolutionary distinctiveness 9 .
Using advanced statistical algorithms, the team quantified compositional turnover of species—where species assemblages change most rapidly—and grouped grid cells with similar faunal compositions into regions and realms 9 .
This approach allowed the scientists to move beyond descriptive patterns to quantitative, testable hypotheses about global biodiversity organization. The computational power applied to this problem enabled analyses at a resolution and scale that Wallace could scarcely have imagined, yet remained faithful to his original vision of classifying regions by their biological affinities.
The update of Wallace's regions required more than just brilliant minds—it depended on a sophisticated suite of data and technological tools that have revolutionized biogeography.
| Tool Category | Specific Applications | Role in the Study |
|---|---|---|
| Species Distribution Databases | Global distribution maps for 21,000+ species | Provided raw data on where amphibians, birds, and mammals occur worldwide 9 |
| Phylogenetic Trees | Evolutionary relationships between species | Enabled measurement of evolutionary distinctiveness, not just species counts 9 |
| GIS Technology | Spatial analysis and mapping | Processed distribution data and visualized resulting regions 6 9 |
| Statistical Algorithms | Cluster analysis, multivariate statistics | Quantified faunal similarities and objectively delineated regions 9 |
| Molecular Data | DNA barcoding, genetic sequencing | Provided foundation for phylogenetic trees beyond morphology 6 |
The integration of these tools represents a broader transformation in biogeography from a descriptive to an analytical science. As noted in recent research, "Modern-day zoogeography places a reliance on GIS to integrate a more precise understanding and predictive model of the past, current, and future population dynamics of animal species" 6 .
Tools like BioDinamica—a suite of user-friendly graphical programs for analyzing spatial patterns of biogeography and macroecology—have made complex analyses accessible to researchers without advanced programming skills 5 . Such tools facilitate everything from species distribution modeling to phylogenetic diversity analysis, accelerating the pace of discovery in biogeography.
This technological toolkit enables researchers to ask questions that Wallace could only speculate about—testing hypotheses about the evolutionary processes that generated contemporary patterns of biodiversity.
The results of this massive analytical effort produced a significantly refined picture of Earth's zoogeographic organization. Where Wallace recognized six regions, the updated analysis revealed eleven distinct zoogeographic realms, further subdivided into twenty regions 9 .
| Wallace's Original Regions (1876) | Updated Realms (2013) | Key Changes |
|---|---|---|
| Palearctic | Palearctic, Sino-Japanese | Eurasia divided into multiple realms based on finer distinctions |
| Ethiopian | Afrotropical, Madagascan | Madagascar recognized as distinct from African mainland |
| Oriental | Indomalayan, Wallacea, Sundaic | Southeast Asia subdivided based on nuanced patterns |
| Australian | Australasian, Oceanian | Pacific Islands distinguished from Australia-New Guinea |
| Nearctic | Nearctic | Largely unchanged but with revised boundaries |
| Neotropical | Neotropical | Largely unchanged but with revised boundaries |
This recalibration of Earth's biological geography extends far beyond academic interest—it provides critical tools and frameworks for addressing some of our most pressing environmental challenges.
The updated regions offer a scientifically robust framework for conservation planning, helping identify areas of unique evolutionary heritage that may deserve protection priority.
For understanding the dynamics of evolutionary processes, the refined regions provide insights into how biodiversity responds to geological and climatic changes over deep time.
This updated map serves as a critical baseline for measuring and predicting biodiversity responses to human-caused environmental changes.
The update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions represents both a tribute to his pioneering work and a testament to science's iterative nature. It demonstrates how foundational insights can withstand the test of time while being refined by new technologies and expanded knowledge. Just as Wallace built upon the work of earlier naturalists, today's scientists stand on Wallace's shoulders, seeing further through the lens of modern tools and data.
This revision is unlikely to be the final word. As research continues, particularly in poorly sampled regions of the tropics and for understudied animal groups like reptiles, insects, and marine organisms, further refinements will inevitably emerge. New technologies, from environmental DNA sampling to even more sophisticated spatial modeling, will continue to sharpen our picture of Earth's biological organization.
What endures is Wallace's fundamental insight: that our planet comprises not just a physical geography of land and water, but a living geography of interconnected yet distinct evolutionary communities.
By updating his map, we honor the spirit of scientific inquiry that drove his work—the relentless curiosity to understand the patterns of life and the forces that create them. As we face unprecedented challenges in conserving this diversity, this refined map offers both a guide and an inspiration, reminding us that properly classifying nature is the essential first step toward understanding and protecting it.
References will be added in the designated section above.